Having been out of blogging action for a couple of weeks due
to the interference of life, this week brings two posts, right after one
another.
Recently, Julie and I took a quick two-day getaway to
Indiana (which we can’t recommend), to Amish country (which we can recommend
highly).
We learned a lot about the Amish while we were there. I knew
very little about them, prior to this trip: only that they were Anabaptists (a
Christian belief wherein baptism of a child at birth or in early childhood is
considered insufficient, and a second baptism at maturity is deemed necessary,
because they believe acceptance of salvation requires kavanah [intent] to be a ma’aseh
[effective deed]-- although they don’t put it quite like that). I knew that
they lived separately, and (I thought) entirely rejected technology much past
the level of around the seventeenth century.
But it turns out that while they do live comparatively
separately, and there are indeed many aspects of technology they reject, they
have a complex system of rules and guidelines for what kinds of technology are
entirely forbidden, and what can be used but not owned, and what can they
neither own nor use themselves but can derive hana’ah (“enjoyment” or profit) from in its use by an English
person (in Amish parlance, all non-Amish people are called English, which suits
me well, since I have always sort of wanted to be English anyhow). In short,
they have a de facto system of halachah. And in many ways, as far as I have
been able to tell, it has many parallels to hilchot
Shabbat (the halachot of Shabbat observance) and hilchot aku”m (the halachot of dealing with non-Jews).
For example, our Amish host took us for a brief ride in his
buggy (I felt a little sorry for the single horse pulling four of us in a wooden
buggy, but she seemed to be fairly fatalistic about the experience): though the
buggy itself is “handmade” wood, drawn by a horse, it has running lights for
night-time driving which are electric, powered by batteries. Also, we noted
that though there were no electronic devices in the spacious
sitting-room/dining room that we were entertained in, our hosts did have a
refrigerator, powered by natural gas (also a gas stove/range, and gas lamps,
which were cool, like being in a 19th century parlor).
It turns out that they are prohibited from being connected
to the electrical grid (part of their living “separate” lives), and so shun
major electrical appliances or electronic devices. But they have no prohibition
about natural gas power (though they are not connected to gas lines, but use
large storage tanks instead), and they make exceptions to the electric
appliance rule for some small things, especially those which can be powered by
batteries and cranks (we didn’t get to ask about solar or wind, although those
kind of seem like they should be permitted-- but then, what do I know from
Amish halachah? There’s plenty of things in our halachah that seem like they
ought to be permitted, but are not, or occasionally vice-versa). And they will use even from-the-grid
electricity if they are working for an English person, and it is done in their place
of business. They will accept car rides from English people, and even charter
buses for communal trips.
The atmosphere of the Amish dinner table (and they were
lovely hosts, though Julie and I couldn’t really eat most of what they served--
they like their fleischigs, which of course are treyf) was convivial, warm,
welcoming, friendly, familial, and full of storytelling and joking. In sum,
much like a frum dinner table.
We learned that these very plain-living folks who were our
hosts, unable to have children (in a prolific culture with significant stigma
attached to infertility, much like the frum world), had adopted and raised
seven kids. We had to learn from our mutual friend that they hadn’t mentioned
the twenty kids whom they had fostered over the eyars.
And it got me thinking, how like and how unlike Haredi Jews
the Amish are. The Haredi world has some really good qualities, some of the
best being their willingness to open their homes and their hands to aid those
around them (even when they themselves might have little), and the tight knit
communitarianism that helps keep frum kids educated in frum schools, keeps frum
shul memberships free or on sliding scales, keeps food on everyone’s plate for
Shabbos. In that sense, they are much like the Amish. The only people I have
known whom I would’ve bet would raise seven adopted kids have been frum.
But the big difference I noted was that the Amish understand
and acknowledge that their lifestyle and their rules are chumrot that they take upon themselves. They acknowledge that one
need not be Amish to be a good person, or even a good Christian. It is their
way, and it is not for everyone. It is deeply ironic, I think, that this
attitude, so similar to how we as Jews approach the idea of conversion and
Judaism (in other words, we don’t proselytize, and we don’t necessarily rush to
encourage converts, because we understand that one need not be Jewish to be a
good person and please God), is so utterly at variance with how Haredim
understand Haredi Judaism. Built upon a vast network of ever-denser chumrot, ascetic minhagim derived from mussar
and mussar-influenced Kabbalistic
teachings, and stultifyingly paralytic interpretations of halachah, Haredi
Judaism nonetheless sees itself as entirely authentic and normative, the beau
ideal from which all other forms of Judaism are deviant.
As devoted to interfaith dialogue as I am, it still
sometimes shocks me when I come across a particularly blatant example of how
Jews can need a lesson in Torah from non-Jews.
The Amish, without having any knowledge of the concept as we
have it, have put into practice the idea from Eruvin 13b of elu v’elu divrei elohim chayim (“these
and also those are the words of the Living God.” They have put into practice
the belief that one should take upon oneself and one’s community a set of
strictures for a purer, more ascetic life, while retaining the awareness that
doing so is a choice, not a matter of universal requirement: and that, my
friends, is tolerance. That is the knowledge-in-action that pluralism creates shalom bayit (internal peace) in the
community at large.
You take a look at what’s going on with the Haredi world in
Israel, between the Orthodox and non-Orthodox communities there and here in the
US. And you tell me that Haredim don’t need what the Amish have to teach. It is
a lesson that would lead us steps closer on the path to tikkun olam, and bringing the coming of the moshiach.
-Ami
No comments:
Post a Comment
We invite all respectful comments and discussion.