As Israel and Jews all over the world have finally begun to
acknowledge the depth of the problem in the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) communities
concerning the treatment of women and non-Haredi Jews, which include a lot of
aspects of tzniut (the “rules” of “modesty”),
I have been watching the various arguments and statements with considerable
interest.
My discomfort with the treatment of women in Orthodoxy is
one of the reasons I haven’t been Orthodox in twenty-five years. And my
discomfort with the treatment of non-Haredim by Haredim is one reason I have
never felt any attraction to that lifestyle.
These two things are actually connected in some ways, not
just independent if equally problematic phenomena.
I have written elsewhere about some of the halachic issues,
and will do so again, so for the moment, I’m going to let that side be.
Tzniut and its use
as a tool to create misogyny and oppression in the Orthodox world bother me a
lot. A whole lot. And while some might write that reaction off to my upbringing--
my mother, Rachel Adler, is also one of the mothers of modern Jewish feminist
thought-- this is not just about feminism and civil rights and other
applications of modern social and critical theory, although those schools of
thoughts make excellent points in their critiques of tzniut and the treatment of women in Orthodoxy.
This goes back to the very principle proposed in the
tradition for the founding concepts associated with tzniut. The idea that by women exposing too much of themselves, or
doing things that could be perceived as sensual, they will cause men to become
distracted by their yitzrei ha-ra
(the urge “to do evil,” or probably more accurately, “for chaos”). Men, then
thinking of sex, will stop studying Torah and praying and other holy stuff, and
instead will do unthinkable and perverse things in the quest to slake their
unquenchable concupiscent lusts, which apparently guys are universally prone to
do....
The basic premise is flawed. Deeply flawed. Leaving aside,
for the moment, the questionable premise that all men barely restrain vast
arrays of unquenchable concupiscent lusts which can be set loose at any moment
by the sight of a passing uncovered ankle, the fundamental idea put forth by
these rabbis in our tradition is that because every man struggles with his yetzer (his drives), women need to cover
themselves from head to toe, cover their hair, shut up, and, at some key
moments, hide behind walls. (I could, of course, also mention that this whole
scenario is a fairly ridiculous principle to the 10% or so of the Jewish People
who are gay. But that’s another conversation, I think.)
But the thing is, that’s not how to master your yetzer. Self-control, self-discipline
(both mental and emotional) and spiritual focus are not created by trying to
control the world around you. They are created by exerting some measure of
control on the world within. As any recovering alcoholic will tell you, you
don’t stop drinking by trying to ensure that no one around you drinks and you
never encounter alcohol. You stop drinking by deciding that alcohol will not
control your life, and you will not drink it: regardless of what others may do;
regardless of the situation you are in. This, my friends, is what it looks like
to master your yetzer for something.
And since most people are not actually sex addicts, the
principle should be all the better in its application to their lives, where it
should be easier for them to come to control themselves and their sexual
desires.
Not only is what the Haredim are doing in their communities
in Israel and in America wrong for all the usual feminist/civil rights reasons,
it’s wrong because it is, spiritually, an utter failure.
Instead of mastering their yitzarim, Haredim are obsessed with sex: not necessarily in the
ways that we non-Haredim might recognize, but in their own ways. Non-Orthodox
people often find it literally unbelievable how much time in the Haredi world
is spent dealing with workarounds to prevent men and women spending too much
time together, or time alone together, or touching each other in utterly benign
and innocent ways, or generally keeping women silenced, covered, and locked
into kitchen-and-cradle social roles, away from where men spend most of their
time. I could write pages describing the insane chumrot (legal strictures) created over the past forty-odd years
that have collectively moved Haredi Judaism from merely conservative (small
“c”) to absolutely clinical when it comes to women and sexuality, and it would
still be hard to believe if one hasn’t seen it all in action.
But, because of the ever-increasing rigidity and
inflexibility of Orthodox halachic understanding, and the lack in that world of
any real application of machloket l’shem
shamayim (“dispute for the sake of Heaven,” cf. BT Eruvin 13a and
elsewhere), this utter failure of an attempt to create spiritual discipline
within individuals by social engineering has now become enshrined as halachah l’Moshe mi-Sinai (“laws given to
Moses at Sinai”). But it is not so: it is a perversion of halachah and
tradition. It has to go.
To master your yetzer,
you must direct focus inward, not outward. You must be confronted, regularly,
with the thing to which your yetzer
drives you, so that you become accustomed to its presence, and are able to
control your reactions.
This is one thing in which the Jews of the non-Orthodox
world excel their Haredi fellows at doing. To put it another way, non-Orthodox
shuls (synagogues) have no mechitzas
(walls or other barriers separating the women and the men): on the contrary,
men and women sit together. And both sexes wear less clothing than their Haredi
counterparts-- even in very straitlaced non-Orthodox congregations. And I am
sure that all my non-Orthodox readers will concur with me when I say that in
twenty-plus years of davening
(praying) at non-Orthodox shuls, I have never once seen a man break off in the
middle of his prayers, grab a passing woman, and shout, “I can’t take it
anymore, I gotta have you now!”
Have I seen a fair amount of idle chat instead of prayer?
Yes: and I’ve seen the same thing amongst men in Orthodox shuls. Have I seen
people praying together in amicable community, focused on tefillah (prayer) and Torah? Yes. In both Orthodox and non-Orthodox
shuls. But never have I seen someone surrender to his yetzer because he happened to be near women-- even very attractive
women. And while this may have something to do with the virtues of the people I
have seen, it probably has mostly to do with the fact that in the non-Orthodox
world, men and women are often together: often work together, do recreational
activities together, often have casual contact with one another, and are
accustomed to interacting with those of the opposite sex and even to seeing
them in attractive and sometimes revealing clothing. And even those of us who
are not able to consistently ignore the existence of attractive individuals of
the opposite sex are at least able to put such thoughts aside long enough to
sit through a service without being distracted into hypersexualized apoplexy.
That may not be “mastering” your yetzer, but
it’s a step on the road. And it’s certainly a better step than saying “I am
tempted! The solution is for you to be less tempting!”
Tzniut as it is
currently understood has got to go, not merely for reasons of rights and
freedoms, but for spiritual ones as well. That’s what it comes down to.
-Ami
No comments:
Post a Comment
We invite all respectful comments and discussion.